Approximately seven months have passed since the United States Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota vs. Wayfair, which held that a retailer without a physical presence in a state, but with a “significant quantity” of sales in that state, had sufficient nexus to take on the burden of sales tax collection. In this article, Roberta Christensen addresses the short- and long- term impact of the decision on remote sellers and those that do business with them.

_{This content is made available for educational purposes only and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this content, you understand there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the publisher. The content should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.}